Yahoo Message Number: 122 (http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/supercrvgroup/conversations/messages/122)
Open the Specifications/dimensions tab to find the weight distribution info....
Denny
See what's new at AOL.com (http://www.aol.com?NCID=AOLCMP00300000001170) and Make AOL Your Homepage (http://www.aol.com/mksplash.adp?NCID=AOLCMP00300000001169).
Yahoo Message Number: 123 (http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/supercrvgroup/conversations/messages/123)
Attachments :
I see what you are pointing to BUT I don't think it means what one might think it means. I think this might indicate how the load added by the house manufacturer and then the weight added by the owner can be distributed. The 6% up front would account for the fact that when that chassis leaves the factory the bulk of the weight is up front - the complete cab and engine and they sure aren't going to come in at 1100 lbs.
When I look at the weights that Rich got it indicates that just cannot be the case - can 11 inches in wheelbase make that much difference? I don't doubt the short wheelbase is causing you problems but lets remember that the front axle is rated to 7,000 lbs and the rear to 13,500. If you were loaded to your GVWR of 19,500 lbs and only had 1100 lbs on the front, then you would be way way way beyond the GAWR for the rear and I'd think it would be almost impossible to drive it. Also, I doubt that the weight capacity of your four rear tires would be over 18,000 lbs. My rears only clear the 13,500 lbs GAWR by a couple of hundred pounds.
Here is what Rich Panganiban posted on RV.net when he had his 32SS weighted (8.1 Vortec).
Yahoo Message Number: 124 (http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/supercrvgroup/conversations/messages/124)
Yahoo Message Number: 125 (http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/supercrvgroup/conversations/messages/125)
Hi,
FWIW, I just put my 07 Jayco 33DS on the scale yesterday w/ full
Gas, propane and fresh water. Weights are very similar to what is
referenced below.
Front: 5120 lbs
Rear: 11480 lbs
Total: 16600 lbs
, "Donald A. Leslie"
wrote:
difference? I
GAWR for
it.
would be
couple of
fuel,
scale,
unless he
than the
that is
adding in
of the
that is
chassis.
-------
NCID=AOLCMP00300000001169>.
Yahoo Message Number: 126 (http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/supercrvgroup/conversations/messages/126)
Great. Nice to see 2900 lbs to spare with good distribution as Rich found. 2000 lbs to use on rear axle and the front axle in our case gets my weight + DW + our son.
Thanks for providing the numbers.
Don
rkafka wrote:
Yahoo Message Number: 127 (http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/supercrvgroup/conversations/messages/127)
When I looked at these numbers it brought to mind our first MH - a 2000 Triple E Commander Class A on the Ford 20,500 chassis (7000 front axle and 13,500 rear). We filled the gas tank, propane tank and put 1/4 tank full of fresh water in it. Then off to the scales. The GVW was fine with about 1800 lbs to spare with DW and me in our seats. The problem was the front axle was within 60 lbs of the GAWR. Our son is alway with us and he would have put the front axle weight over the 7000 lbs. I was very annoyed - to say the least.
My No. 2 son who is an MEng and works in the auto biz in Detroit took a look, asked where the water tank was located (I said under the bed right at the back) and then paced off the distance from the rear axle to the back of the MH and the to the front. He then said FILL THE FRESH WATER TANK. That added about 500 lbs of water and took 250 lbs off of the front axle. I called Triple E and they said exactly the same thing and added that for weight balance all weights assume a FULL fresh water tank.
This was annoying since we did not want to drive around with a full tank of water - but we had to. We were planning to go to Florida in early January of 2004. We had never towed before and were going to have to get a dolly for one of our cars, and we were going to have to leave Canada and drive to FLA with a full tank of water and maybe even n snow and ice. I got cold feet and suggested to DW that we go to New Zealand and Australia for 2 months instead (we'd been there for two months in Jan to Mar 2003). So we did. While driving around NZ and AU I got this great idea (? ? ? ? ?) to get a pusher. Ended up that May with a new 2004 Winnie Journey 39W with 2 slides towing a 2004 Colorado. A mistake. After 15 months we still didn't have it debugged. It had good CCC though and drove well. Then went on to a 2006 HR Ambassador 40PLQ that had 4 slides and a den - great great floorplan, good CCC and we really enjoyed it. Then last year we bought the year old park model on the lot next to ours in FLA and really didn't need a monster any longer but by then had to get something that could tow our 2007 Tahoe - that meant Kodiak or larger. Also, since we seem to carry a lot we figured we'd better have decent storage area and weight capacity - thus the 32SS. We liked some aspects of the 33DS floorplan more but really wanted something smaller than even the 32SS, but there was really nothing smaller that could meet our towing requirements.
So, weight distribution is pretty significant.
Don
Donald A. Leslie wrote:
Yahoo Message Number: 128 (http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/supercrvgroup/conversations/messages/128)
Yahoo Message Number: 155 (http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/supercrvgroup/conversations/messages/155)
Interesting ..... if you try to open the link I sent a few days ago showing the specs on the C5500, you will receive an error message showing that the web page has been "moved," or there may be technical issues.
To the GM/Chevrolet forum participant..... perhaps you can provide us with more insight when we need it, rather than remaining in the shadows... we will appreciate your involvement and feedback in this forum.
Denny
See what's new at AOL.com (http://www.aol.com?NCID=AOLCMP00300000001170) and Make AOL Your Homepage (http://www.aol.com/mksplash.adp?NCID=AOLCMP00300000001169).