Re: GM Drive train Warranty on modified chassis??? Reply #25 – January 16, 2008, 02:12:35 pm Yahoo Message Number: 426QuoteTrx, I know the exact wheel base for my rig - when it left GM and when itleft Jayco. When it left GM it was 213.5. When it left Jayco it was225. When I get underneath I can clearly see the overlapping framerail that was inserted after they cut. It extended the w/b by 11.5inches. Then, as I slide to the back I find another extension of theframe rails to handle the length of the MH built on it. I fail to seewhat I'd get from the build order that I can't get from my eyes?BTW, you don't see a frame extension behind the rear axle on yourorder but my guess is that you may have a very such an extension.Note that your build order only refers to w/b and provides noindication of frame length. If you crawl underneath my guess is thatyou may find an extension of one to 2 ft, if not a bit more (is yourMH 35 feet long?).Keep in mind that the issue here is the warranty. If GM says "thatparticular item isn't covered by us then it has to be covered byeither Jayco or the chassis extender. If the both deny liabilityduring the first two years if I had a problem with the extensions orthe drive train, then I'd look at taking them to court.My understanding from something posted on RV.net a while back is thatFord lays out specs for extensions and if the standard is met Fordcovers the chassis and engine. As you can see in the material Dennyposted, GM just washes its hands of the warranty.What annoys me more than this is that the same basic engine (well, thehigher HP version yet) is used by Workhorse Chassis Corp in its Agassers and it has put the 5 year warranty on the engine stating itdid so when GM increased the warranty. I find it unfair that we arerestricted to two years when a less stressed version is used in a muchlighter MH.DOn 16-Jan-08, at 1:29 AM, trx_racer wrote:So, PaulI guess that means we are related...lolI still believe Don will find the exact W/B for his rig if he was toget a "build sheet" from a GM dealer. If he did get a copy of the"B/S", he would have a stronger argument with or against Jayco.Trx...., "kemper_mm" wrote:, Don Lesliewrote:I don't think this is the same thing (would others please jump inwithviews). Your chassis was not, IMO, extended. GS simply bought achassis with a longer w/b (239 inches I assume since that is theonlyoption for MHs above 213.5) rather than buy a shorter one andcut itinto two between the front and rear axle, insert pieces of framerail, weld them (and maybe bold them as well), put in a new longer driveshaft, modify the exhaust etc. (actually, Jayco doesn't do this, Igather they have another firm do it and I've forgotten its name)Inyour case the frame rails would be one piece from the front tobeyondthe rear axle (where GS or its subcontractor likely have welded onextensions to handle the box it put on). I don't think GM does aunitwith frame rails as long as those on your MH. I wish Jayco haddonethis since I'd prefer the 239 (wow, what a ratio that would be -.612)and it would have left the GM warranty on the driveshaft in place.DonOn 15-Jan-08, at 10:34 PM, trx_racer wrote:> Don, >> I took it to mean, that in my case Gulfstream had ordered thechassis> extend from GM. This I would think would help if drive trainissues> came up. You should be able to get the same thing from your GMdealer, > then you can see if the wheelbase on your coach was done by GM.>> Hope that helps....> Trx>> , "Leslie, Don"> wrote:> >> > I must be missing something. How does this explain chassismods> such as extended> > wheelbase or extended frame rails?> >> > Don> >> > , "trx_racer"> wrote:> > >> > > *** TO ALL MEMBERS***> > >> > > Please take a look at my album, I have posted a couple ofpics> of a> > > document I asked my dealer to get for me. This i believeshould> answer> > > some, maybe all questions regard modded chassis.> > >> > > I would have posted pics here, but don't know how or if itcan be> done.> > >> > > Thank You, > > >> > > Trx...> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > , Dmyhre943@wrote:> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > In a message dated 1/15/2008 1:31:52 P.M. Pacific StandardTime, > > > > agret@ writes:> > > >> > > > You may be right but I am fighting today not only with the> dealer but> > > > with GM and Jayco on the springs as they had agreed toreplace> or> > > > beef up and now not!!!!! Dane> > > >> > > > Dane, > > > >> > > > First of all, GM isn't going to do anything about your> problem. All> > > they> > > > did was to sell the cab/chassis to Jayco. And the dealerdoesn't> > > have an> > > > interest in your problem either since he has already madethe> sale, > > > gotten your> > > > $$$, and truthfully, any issues with the coach, hefeels, are> > > Jayco's problem, > > > > because Jayco built the dang thing.> > > >> > > > Your only recourse, IMHO, is to go after the RVmanufacturer.> They> > > dictate> > > > what needs to be done, and ultimately, will pay thebill. Our> > > advantage is> > > > that they know we are here, in numbers, to help or hurttheir> > > sales. The> > > > starting place is to contact Jayco on their website.Jayco's> > > website appears to> > > > be oriented toward the customer, as they say, before ANDafter> the> > > sale.> > > > Send them a note on this link, > > > _http://www.jayco.com/php/about/contact.form.php_> > > > (http://www.jayco.com/php/about/contact.form.php) , andtell> them> > > that you> > > > are a member of an RV group of owners dedicated toimprove the> > > quality of the> > > > Jayco product, and ask for their help in resolving thisissue> > > immediately.> > > > Explain that you will have the support of other owners in> getting> > > the word out> > > > as to the positive nature of their response.> > > >> > > > Keep us in the loop on how Jayco responds.> > > >> > > > Denny> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > Start the year off right. Easy ways tostay in> shape.> > >> > > >>http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489> > > >> > >> >>>>Trx, Don is correct, Gulfstream bought your chassis with the 239" WBrightfrom the GM factory. Your Build Sheet shows the same WB code of XFA(239")as ours does (see my post of 1/14/08). Intrestingly, yourBuildSheet shows that your chassis was built the day before ours wasbuilt.Between RPO codes and vin specific Build Sheets we can learn a lotabout our chassis.Paul"I fail to see what I'd get from the build order that I can't get frommy eyes?"Don, Obtaining your specific Build Sheet will reveal a lot more about yourrig than just the wheelbase. For example, you will find where GMfirst shipped the chassis, when and where it was built and specificwarranty information, etc.Regarding warranties, my VIN/Build Sheet clearly shows differentmileages & time limits for various chassis components, not just asimple 5 year term. They include 24/unlimited Bumper to Bumper to ashigh as 60/100000 Medium Duty Diesel Engine with $100 Deduct after36/36, etc.You can go to www.dieselplace.com and request a free VIN & BuildSheet. Just scroll down to the section titled "Official GMInformation" and then check "VIN Check Requests". This servicerequires regerstering with The Diesel Place and a few day wait toreceive your data.Regarding chassis modifications, they are very common in the RVindustry and, yes, they may affect warranties. Many "high end" dieselpushers have extended wheelbases and frame extensions. Some are doneby Mor/Ryde and other shops and some are done in house. Winnebago isreputed to be among the best at doing this.I don't doubt for a moment that you are seeing a wheelbase and/orframe modification on your MH.. I just believe your Vin specificbuild sheet data will provide you with more data.Paul Quote Selected
Re: GM Drive train Warranty on modified chassis??? Reply #26 – January 16, 2008, 02:19:02 pm Yahoo Message Number: 427kemper_mm wrote:QuoteYou can go to www.dieselplace.com and request a free VIN & BuildSheet. Just scroll down to the section titled "Official GMInformation" and then check "VIN Check Requests". This servicerequires regerstering with The Diesel Place and a few day wait toreceive your data.Does this require you have a diesel coach or will they do one for thegas powered 32SS guys too?Take care, Greg Quote Selected
Re: GM Drive train Warranty on modified chassis??? Reply #27 – January 16, 2008, 02:33:20 pm Yahoo Message Number: 428Greg Gimlick wrote:Quotekemper_mm wrote:You can go to www.dieselplace. com and request a free VIN & BuildSheet. Just scroll down to the section titled "Official GMInformation" and then check "VIN Check Requests". This servicerequires regerstering with The Diesel Place and a few day wait toreceive your data.Does this require you have a diesel coach or will they do one for thegas powered 32SS guys too?Take care, GregNo virus found in this incoming message.Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.5/1228 - Release Date: 1/16/2008 9:01 AMGreg, They may also supply VIN/Build sheet info for gas rigs too as their homepage shows a heading for "GM Gassers" under their "Other Vehicle" section.Paul Quote Selected
Re: GM Drive train Warranty on modified chassis??? Reply #28 – January 16, 2008, 02:56:13 pm Yahoo Message Number: 429Paul, you have a diesel and there is a different warranty period for the engine vs the chassis. There is only 24 months on the Kodiak with 8.1. GM's material makes it clear that MDT's do not get the 100,000 miles warranty it put on everything else.I still question what the build sheet that Trx posted will give me. I have the GM Kodiak order form (which I posted in files) and above my visor is the label that contains the codes that are applicable to my motorhome. I checked off the codes that are on the label to the build list and they seem to provide exactly what Trx's build sheet covers.There are several differences and I assume they are due to diesel vs gas and perhaps length.Trx's diesel engine is governed at 75 mph. My 8.1 gas is not. He has a front stabilizer, I do not. GS took GM seats, Jayco took it without seats. He got auto engine shut down, I did not (again a diesel feature I think). We both have 4.78 rear axle ratios. He Michelins and I have Goodyears (if his Michelin are XRV's then I'm really happy to have GY) but his rear has highway truck tread and mine have RV tread. Both were assembled in Flint. All of that comes from that label and it seems to cover the build sheet items.So, I seem to have all the info that is on the two pages that Trx posted. Am I missing something?DonOn 16-Jan-08, at 2:12 PM, kemper_mm wrote: Quote Selected
Re: GM Drive train Warranty on modified chassis??? Reply #29 – January 16, 2008, 03:02:02 pm Yahoo Message Number: 430 Quote Selected
Re: GM Drive train Warranty on modified chassis??? Reply #30 – January 16, 2008, 03:18:57 pm Yahoo Message Number: 431Can someone give me the website to get my spec sheets on the 08Kodiak. I am in a locked horns fight now with Jayco and GM over thechassis and suspension. I have sent a registered letter to the CEOof Jayco and each of you should as well. His address is:Mr Wilbur Vontrager903 South Main StreetMiddlebury, Indiana 46540I bet if enough of us complain we will get some relief and be sure tosend it registered return receipt requested, DaneQuoteMike - I've had the specs since last March and have sent them to afew people on the forum on request. I just realized that I shouldpost them to the files section. Anyone that would like the documentcan get it at:http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/KodiakChassisClassC/files/Kodiak /QuoteI've also posted the GM Media release dated Aug 1/2006 thatdescribes the enhancements for 2007 and the UltraRide Air Suspension brochure.I sure wish that Jayco had simply used the 239 WB rather thanextending.QuoteI agree the welds and overlapping of the frame rail inserts lookpretty good but the GM warranty problem is real. My dealer hasbeen caught in the middle of this problem as well.With a 2 year warranty, IMO anything GM won't cover Jayco hadbetter cover.I'm still PO'd that GM did not put the 5 year power train warrantyon that Workhorse added after GM put it on all but medium duty trucks.DonOn 13-Jan-08, at 10:44 PM, smokie39157 wrote:Don, I know you and several other people have commented about theframe extensions done by some manufacturers including Jayco. Itis aQuotefact that on my 07 Jayco Kodiak Greyhawk 32SS, the front frame hasbeen spliced and 12 inches added to the wheelbase. Also in therear, Quotebehind the axle (end of original frame) they have added a 24 inchextension. Now, it appears to me that they did a good job ofsplicing all of this and reinforced it with good size plates andwelds.The INTERNET site that has all of the order information for the 07medium duty trucks has been down for the last couple of days so Ican't verify everything at this time. However, the best I rememberis that they showed a wheelbase of 213.5 as one option and this iswhat Jayco used for the 32SS. Jayco then added the 12 inches tomake the wheelbase 225 inches. Now, this also means they had to extendthe drive train (drive shaft) a foot also. So, did Jayco (andothers) modify this or buy it from another source, or is it allgenuine GM parts. Maybe this is why GM will not honor the drivetrain warranty.All of this is assuming that GM really does refuse to honor thewarranty if it is needed. I cannot believe that a company wouldsell a product with no drive train warranty without "plainly" makingthe buyer aware of it. Does anybody know for a fact that GM will nothonor the warranty? I do not see how Jayco could get away withthis. Anyway, does anybody have anything new to add to this saga?I just checked and the site is back up. The next size up inwheelbase is 239 inches. I suppose that is why Jayco added to the213.5 to get 225 instead of going to the 239. This is the link:http://eogld.ecomm.gm.com/NASApp/mediumduty/proddesc.jsp?year=2007&brandID=1&line=166&modelID=1249&package=1341&series=1§ioQuoten=0&page=1It has some very good info. You can look at standard equipment andoptions via the menu on the left side. You can check all of yourRPO Quote Selected
Re: GM Drive train Warranty on modified chassis??? Reply #31 – January 16, 2008, 03:26:03 pm Yahoo Message Number: 432-Website did not good see my last post on the action I am taking.Dane-- In KodiakChassisClassC@yahoogroups.comQuoteIn a message dated 1/15/2008 1:31:52 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, agret@... writes:You may be right but I am fighting today not only with the dealerbut with GM and Jayco on the springs as they had agreed to replace orbeef up and now not!!!!! DaneDane, First of all, GM isn't going to do anything about your problem.All theyQuotedid was to sell the cab/chassis to Jayco. And the dealer doesn'thave anQuoteinterest in your problem either since he has already made the sale, gotten yourQuote$$$, and truthfully, any issues with the coach, he feels, areJayco's problem, Quotebecause Jayco built the dang thing.Your only recourse, IMHO, is to go after the RV manufacturer.They dictateQuotewhat needs to be done, and ultimately, will pay the bill. Ouradvantage isQuotethat they know we are here, in numbers, to help or hurt theirsales. TheQuotestarting place is to contact Jayco on their website. Jayco'swebsite appears toQuotebe oriented toward the customer, as they say, before AND after thesale.QuoteSend them a note on this link, _http://www.jayco.com/php/about/contact.form.php_Quote(http://www.jayco.com/php/about/contact.form.php) , and tell themthat youQuoteare a member of an RV group of owners dedicated to improve thequality of theQuoteJayco product, and ask for their help in resolving this issueimmediately.QuoteExplain that you will have the support of other owners in gettingthe word outQuoteas to the positive nature of their response.Keep us in the loop on how Jayco responds.DennyStart the year off right. Easy ways to stay inshape.Quotehttp://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489 Quote Selected